If Poets have written poetry on love and if Metaphysics have spoken about
the spirit of love be assured that Physicists have made innumerable theories on
Physics of love
1) Love and Quantum Entanglement is the most famous one:
Entanglement is one of the strangest predictions of quantum
mechanics. Two objects are entangled if their physical properties are undefined
but correlated, even when the two objects are separated by a large distance. So when one meets
someone that one clicks the instantly then maybe they have been quantamally entangled
through a process of being in a different space time.
2) Many mathematicians have made differential equations on
love
A GeoGebra Heart Graph
with this equation plots a heart graph for you
.
3) Another way of analysing love comes from a field of
science called human chemistry. In human chemistry there is a human molecular
formula one human.
This formula shows
the total number of elements that comprise the typical 65kg person.
The chemical reaction of love ensues from a reaction between
a single male human molecule, symbol Mx, and a single female human molecule
M(x) + F)y) = M(x)F(y)
Now the compatibility of a male ad a female to be bonded in
love and stay in love depends on a chemical thermodynamic formula
Delta G= G{MxFy} - (G{M}x+G{Fy})
a) in which
GMxFy is the Gibbs free energy of the couple in their bonded relationship
state, in the form of a dihumanide molecule (two attached humans viewed as one
single molecule)
b) GMx is the measure of the Gibbs free energy of
the male as a single unattached human molecule
c)and GFy is the measure of the Gibbs free
energy of the male as a single unattached human
molecule.
This logic
is summarized well by the following 1999 definition of molecular bonding by
American-born Canadian biophysical chemist Julie Forman-Kay.
The
calculated value of this so-called "marriage reaction", in human
terms, Gibbs free energy change ΔG will determine the naturalness or
feasibility of the potential marriage as follows:
dG < 0 ΔG < 0 Lewis
inequality for a natural process (or spontaneous process), one in which the
change will occur naturally or spontaneously and in which useful energy is
obtainable from the system.
dG > 0 ΔG > 0 Lewis
inequality for an unnatural process (or non-spontaneous process), one in which
useful energy is required to be supplied to the given system to bring about the
desired change.
The first
of these criterion's, i.e. the Lewis inequality for a natural process, will
energetically quantify so-called "natural marriages" and the
magnitude of the Gibbs free energy change, when less than zero, will determine
the so-called measure of "love" or rather Gottman stability ratio of
love to hate in the structure of the stability of the bond, according to the
following rules (spontaneity criterion).
According to Huang a successful partnership between a pair will depend on the amout of free energy - the ones who have less free energy than
the starting compounds and are more stable. In a reaction
4) In chemistry, elective
affinity, a variant of “affinity”, was a term
used, especially in the 18th century, to define a tendency of a chemical species to “elect” to unit with one chemical
entity in preference to that of another.
5) In 2006, American young adult fiction author John Green published the award-winning book An Abundance of Katherines : The Theorem of Underlying Katherine Predictability, which he hopes will predict the future of any relationship
6) Love explained as a Le Chatlier's principle
In chemistry, Le Chatelier’s principle, also called "Le Chatelier-Braun principle" systems in equilibrium tend to react to perturbations in a transformational direction towards the change, thus re-establishing a new equilibrium.
7) There are fun equations to explain sex
There are innumerable ways to express love. The poet in me would say
If
you say love is strong,
Then it can certainly become weak,
If you say love is deep,
Then it can certainly become shallow,
...for if you feel one
...the
other will exist
When conditions change the other will be felt,
However if one says that
Love just is..
In that moment and infinity
Indescribable, inexpressible
Without sides of any emotions
Then it just "IS"
The spiritualist in me would say :Look at everyone as - The self in me as the self in all.
When one connects to other at the level of spirit - whatever that is then the ego vanishes and one feels the power of love .
Love conquers all whether one believes or not. If you do not think so then may be the love that you have experienced and given comes from the center of ego. Let your love be proactive.
Happy Valentine's Day all :)
( There has been a considerable research in writing this blog)
http://mathandmultimedia.com/2013/07/18/constructing-a-geogebra-heart-graph/
http://www.eoht.info/page/male-female+reaction
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbs_free_energy
http://www.mathsisfun.com/algebra/inequality-properties.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elective_Affinities
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Abundance_of_Katherines